View My Profile
Buckin n****s down cuz they think shit is sweet
The cheese stands alone
I just want to see his face
all this pressure to be bright
many people will try to destroy her, but if she we...
an expression of the inexpressible
What gives you the right to fuck with our lives: L...
The bitch in yoo
Patrick Lynch is a asshole
discriminate me, why can't you help?
Monday, December 04, 2006
Look at your track record, that's how far it goes back, you're better off trying to bring RSO back:
Jeff Jacoby and the Weekly Standard continue the preemptive strike on Jim Baker. Ralph Peters:
Baker is the dean emeritus of a reactionary school of diplomats--inaccurately labeled "realists"--whose support of the shah of Iran, the Saudi royal family, Anwar Sadat, then Hosni Mubarak, and, not least, Saddam Hussein delivered short-term stability that proved illusory in the long run. It was the "realist" elevation of stability above all other strategic factors--echoing Prince Metternich--that gave us not only the radical regime in Iran, but, ultimately, al Qaeda and 9/11.So, just so we're clear: the neocon line here is that someone's track record of failure in foreign policy should marginalize that person in the public sphere. Let's shake on it. No take-backs. This is the line: if you fucked up on an important foreign-policy issue -- or better yet, if you keep fucking up -- you're out of the debate. You read it in the Standard first, with not a single iota of irony.
In a way, Jacoby's remarks about Baker echo the Christopher Hitchens line, "I prefer a United States that overthrows Saddam to a United States that props him up," the point being that the United States' wonderfully idealistic project in Iraq has broken with an older tradition of Kissingerian cynicism, tolerance of dictatorships, etc.